- From: Aaron Gustafson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 11:22:15 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2021 18:22:52 UTC
This is great folks! I agree that I like the syntax better where the key is the MQ. Should I start a PR on this? > For "icons", which we deal with in w3c/image-resource#26, it seems like @aarongustafson's proposal is the latest and greatest. Yes, I have it [tracked in a bug against `ImageResource` as well](https://github.com/w3c/image-resource/issues/26). Ideally, it’d be great to have the `ImageResource` support color prefs so as not to create [the kind of complicated duplication you mentioned](https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/975#issuecomment-852029560), @tomayac. But if folks need to override separately, it’d be there as a fallback. Just to cover all the bases, I’d suggest we try to land the `ImageResource` one first so the Manifest spec can reference it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/975#issuecomment-852346876
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2021 18:22:52 UTC