- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:10:52 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2021 21:11:05 UTC
@rniwa commented on this pull request. > @@ -2668,6 +2681,11 @@ indicated in the <a for=/>remove</a> algorithm below. <p>If <var>node</var> has an <a>inclusive descendant</a> that is a <a>slot</a>, then: <ol> + <li><p>for each <a>slot</a> <var>slot</var> in <var>node</var>'s <a for=tree>inclusive descendants</a>, + if <var>slot</var>'s <a for=tree>root</a> is a <a for=/>shadow root</a> whose <a for=tree>root</a>'s + <a for=ShadowRoot>slot assignment</a> is "<code>manual</code>", then set <var>slot</var>'s + <a>manually assigned nodes</a> to an empty set. Well, it would mean that that this slot.assingedNodes would behave differently from element ID reflection, which seems bad. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/860#discussion_r581390973
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2021 21:11:05 UTC