- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:49:30 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2021 19:49:43 UTC
@domenic commented on this pull request. This LGTM except for the set vs. list question. > @@ -2177,6 +2177,10 @@ steps:</p> <li><p>If the <i>open flag</i> is set and <var>shadow</var>'s <a for=ShadowRoot>mode</a> is <em>not</em> "<code>open</code>", then return null.</p></li> + <li><p>If <var>shadow</var>'s <a for=ShadowRoot>slot assignment</a> is "<code>manual</code>", + then return the <a>slot</a> in <var>shadow</var>'s <a for=tree>descendants</a> whose <a>manually assigned nodes</a> + <a for=set>contains</a> <var>slottable</var>, if any, and null otherwise.</p></li> The for=set here is questionable per https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/5483#issuecomment-784464588 > @@ -2660,6 +2682,11 @@ indicated in the <a for=/>remove</a> algorithm below. <p>If <var>node</var> has an <a>inclusive descendant</a> that is a <a>slot</a>, then: <ol> + <li><p>for each <a>slot</a> <var>slot</var> in <var>node</var>'s <a for=tree>inclusive descendants</a>, ```suggestion <li><p>For each <a>slot</a> <var>slot</var> in <var>node</var>'s <a for=tree>inclusive descendants</a>, ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/860#pullrequestreview-596734735
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2021 19:49:43 UTC