Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebCodecs (again!) (#612)

Strange! I swear I wrote early feedback on this yesterday, but apparently I was imagining I did or I got distracted and forgot to press the green button. Abridged summary of what I wanted to write:

- Explainer and spec disagree on AudioFrame vs AudioPacket?
- VideoFrame has destroy/clone but AudioFrame|Packet does not - why?
- In VideoFrame, wild guess is that plane is intended to give the original framebuffer (e.g. in YCbCr, as multiple grayscale images?) while the image bitmap method is expected to return something interoperable with the rest of the platform?

Still need to spend more time with this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/612#issuecomment-782555137