Re: [WICG/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624)

And here is the link to HTML design documents and specifically to `Priority of Constituencies` which is broken by reasons given by @annevk for closing this issue.

 https://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies

> ### 3.2. Priority of Constituencies
> 
> In case of conflict, consider users over authors over implementors over specifiers over theoretical purity. In other words costs or difficulties to the user should be given more weight than costs to authors; which in turn should be given more weight than costs to implementors; which should be given more weight than costs to authors of the spec itself, which should be given more weight than those proposing changes for theoretical reasons alone. Of course, it is preferred to make things better for multiple constituencies at once.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/624#issuecomment-774651490