Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Conditional Focus (When Display-Capture Starts) (#679)

> Hi @eladalon1983 - Looking at the [thread in WebRTC](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/issues/190), it looks like this is still under active discussion. If so, it seems like it might be premature for the TAG to be reviewing this? Is the plan to incubate this in WICG and then bring it to WebRTC for a future WebRTC rechartering?

It's being [incubated](https://wicg.github.io/conditional-focus/) in the WICG at the same time as it's [presented](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/issues/190) to the WebRTC WG. (It's also in origin trial in Chrome starting m96.) We've had some fruitful discussions in the WebRTC WG and I am hoping we'll reach a mutually agreed-upon API shape in January or possibly earlier.

> Hello, @torgo and I are looking at this in our virtual face-to-face today. We noticed the problem statement in the explainer is from the perspective of the user agent, rather than the end user. Would you mind adding some examples/use cases/scenarios of how the end user of an application benefits or is affected by this feature? 

I can rephrase this with the next revision, no problem. Could you share more of your thoughts about the phrasing? For example, I took a look at the [Web Cryptography API](https://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/#use-cases) and it looked to me to also be centered around the user agent and the applications, not the user. The way I see it, in both cases, the benefit to users is applications can serve them better. In the case of **Conditional Focus**, this better service is through less distractions thrown the user's way, and less clicks required of the user, when they are engaged in something as mentally-challenging as presenting to a live audience. 

> We appreciate that you have noted one security concern in the explainer; do you have an idea of when you will be able to complete the [privacy and security questionnaire](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/)? Are you expecting to take this work to the WebRTC WG?

Presently, I expect to do that after the final shape is agreed upon in WebRTC WG discussions.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/679#issuecomment-989028881