Hi @krgovind we discussed today at our [virtual f2f](https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/tree/gh-pages/2021/12-Madripoor)... We're concerned we may be going around in circles on this. One idea we had to break the cycle is to refocus our attention on a specific use cases linked to FPS - e.g. [Same Party Cookies](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/595) or possibly CHIPS. This would enable us to go back to the problems we're trying to solve and maybe find better ways to try to solve them. Would that make sense to you? We could then take a look at the specific user needs addressed by those designs and evaluate FPS on the basis of those needs. Yes: we had previously said that we would hold off on reviewing Same Party Cookies until we reviewed FPS - but by talking about Same Party Cookies in isolation we may be able to make some progress here. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/342#issuecomment-988975279
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2021 16:35:35 UTC