Re: [whatwg/fetch] Proposal: Support GET bodies (#83)

If you won't support GET bodies, at least consider ignoring a `Content-Length: 0` header when there is no body.  Here is an example of a library written in Ruby which includes that header and, like the Fetch devs here, are 100% convinced they are correct and close the tickets, the Ruby devs in this link are also convinced they are correct and refuse to change their behavior.

https://github.com/httprb/http/issues/487

Please work it out.  I just need my 3rd libraries to stop fighting and come to an agreement. Let's have some pragmatism over pedantry and remember the "Robustness Principle":

> Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept.

Here's an example of a real-world issue I can't get resolved because no one can agree on what the spec is:

https://meta.discourse.org/t/link-preview-http-get-breaks-spec

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/83#issuecomment-902105406