- From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:56:39 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2021 12:56:52 UTC
Hi team, As co-editor of the [MiniApp Manifest spec](https://w3c.github.io/miniapp-manifest/), before moving ahead to the FPWG, I would like to align with you in the process to create homogeneous specifications. The current MiniApps Manifest specification includes references to the [Application Manifest members](https://w3c.github.io/miniapp-manifest/#webappmanifest-members) and defines some [supplementary ones](https://w3c.github.io/miniapp-manifest/#supplementary-manifest-members). Following the extensibility recommendations, we have defined the algorithms to process these MiniApp members, using the manifest [extension point](https://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/#dfn-extension-point). We have indicated this in the [Processing the manifest](https://w3c.github.io/miniapp-manifest/#processing) section. **I wonder if [this way](https://w3c.github.io/miniapp-manifest/#processing) is correct, or we should also indicate it formally using Infra.** Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/974
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2021 12:56:52 UTC