- From: Lea Verou <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:13:16 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2021 19:13:29 UTC
Hi @Rayraz, We are happy with the original proposal which we were asked to review, and @felipeerias successfully addressed the few concerns we had. You raised a few additional issues, and @atanassov directed you to post them in the CSS WG repo to get broader community feedback. The TAG design review is — as the name suggests — a review, and is not suitable for unstructured brainstorming and iterative design, which should happen in the venue a proposal is incubated in (in this case, the CSS WG repo). The TAG is a small group and we do not generally have the bandwidth to engage in such brainstorming. Also, the TAG design review is generally more high level, and not a substitute for the kind of deep review and iterative design that happens in the WG itself. Please raise these issues in the CSS WG repo, iterate on the proposal there, and open a new design review when there are substantial changes, then we could take another look. Does that make sense? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/563#issuecomment-828711605
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2021 19:13:29 UTC