- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:43:47 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2021 06:44:01 UTC
> It's more semantic than just an optimization: it prevents the UA from returning completely arbitrary values on back-to-back calls. Understood. But I think we need to hook that into the eventing model. There should only be a single view of what the permissions are before we get "new information about the user’s intent" (or the permission states get updated because the world changed). > Storing the value somewhere explicit makes sense: we'd clear that storage when the UA receives new information about the user’s intent. Agree, yes. It be nice to more clearly articulate in the spec (maybe in terms of a map) how realms and permissions map to each other. It's not sure clear (from my reading) how that works. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/234#issuecomment-823818881
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2021 06:44:01 UTC