- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:33:45 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2021 06:33:57 UTC
@annevk commented on this pull request. > <li> - <p>For each <a>slottable</a> <a for=tree>child</a> of <var>host</var>, <var>slottable</var>, in + <p>Otherwise, for each <a>slottable</a> <a for=tree>child</a> of <var>host</var>, <var>slottable</var>, in Ah yes, indeed. 😊 If we can get developer feedback in a timely fashion it seems reasonable to block on that, but otherwise I'd be inclined to land these PRs and count on the fact that making a change for that particular scenario is without risk and can be made once developers have some more experience with the API. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/966#discussion_r612972485
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2021 06:33:57 UTC