- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:24:36 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2021 12:24:49 UTC
@annevk commented on this pull request. > <h4 id="service-worker-events">Events</h4> The Service Workers specification defines <dfn export id="dfn-service-worker-events">service worker events</dfn> (each of which is an [=event=]) that include (see the <a href="#execution-context-events">list</a>): * <dfn export id="dfn-lifecycle-events">Lifecycle events</dfn>: {{install!!event}} and {{activate!!event}}. * <dfn export id="dfn-functional-events">Functional events</dfn>: {{fetch!!event}} and the [=events=] defined by other specifications that <a href="#extensibility">extend</a> the Service Workers specification. (See the <a href="#execution-context-events">list</a>.) * {{message!!event}} and {{messageerror!!event}}. </section> - </section> + <section> + <h4 id="service-worker-timing">Timing</h4> + + Service workers mark certain points in times, that are later exposed by the {{PerformanceNavigationTiming|navigation timing}} API. + + A [=/response=] has an associated null or [=service worker timing info=] <dfn export for=response>service worker timing</dfn>, initially set to null. I think it's okay to keep the struct here to make that easier. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1575#discussion_r612396443
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2021 12:24:49 UTC