Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cryptographically secure random UUIDs (#623)

> it's difficult to imagine a better algorithm than version 4 

Right, this was a question because several other languages support multiple versions and there might be demand for that after this ships.

> For potential extensions to the method like this, I like the idea of an options object.

Yes, this looks like a sensible path forward. Thanks for the clarification! 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/623#issuecomment-816752270