- From: Yutaka Hirano <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 02:33:33 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1204/review/629766307@github.com>
@yutakahirano commented on this pull request. > @@ -5061,6 +5061,13 @@ optional boolean <var>forceNewConnection</var> (default false), run these steps: <ul> <li><p>Follow the relevant requirements from HTTP. [[!HTTP]] [[!HTTP-SEMANTICS]] [[!HTTP-COND]] [[!HTTP-CACHING]] [[!HTTP-AUTH]] + <li><p> In resolving the HTTP request, there is an evitable situaion that the user agent must + resend the <var>request</var> body (e.g. socket time-out). + If <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> is non-null, and <var>request</var>'s + <a for=request>body</a>'s <a for=body>source</a> is null, there is an <a>implementation-defined</a> -1 indent > @@ -5061,6 +5061,13 @@ optional boolean <var>forceNewConnection</var> (default false), run these steps: <ul> <li><p>Follow the relevant requirements from HTTP. [[!HTTP]] [[!HTTP-SEMANTICS]] [[!HTTP-COND]] [[!HTTP-CACHING]] [[!HTTP-AUTH]] + <li><p> In resolving the HTTP request, there is an evitable situaion that the user agent must > evitable inevitable? > @@ -5061,6 +5061,13 @@ optional boolean <var>forceNewConnection</var> (default false), run these steps: <ul> <li><p>Follow the relevant requirements from HTTP. [[!HTTP]] [[!HTTP-SEMANTICS]] [[!HTTP-COND]] [[!HTTP-CACHING]] [[!HTTP-AUTH]] + <li><p> In resolving the HTTP request, there is an evitable situaion that the user agent must + resend the <var>request</var> body (e.g. socket time-out). + If <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> is non-null, and <var>request</var>'s + <a for=request>body</a>'s <a for=body>source</a> is null, there is an <a>implementation-defined</a> + cache limit not to cache the entire <a for=request>body</a>'s stream. If the cache runs out, I think "cache" is not good here. It is a storage providing a faster way to read/write, but a cache shouldn't provide additional functionality - we need to be able to do everything without cache. In this case, without the storage we cannot resend the request body, so there is a functional difference, and hence it's not cache. I suggest using "buffer" instead of "cache". > @@ -5061,6 +5061,13 @@ optional boolean <var>forceNewConnection</var> (default false), run these steps: <ul> <li><p>Follow the relevant requirements from HTTP. [[!HTTP]] [[!HTTP-SEMANTICS]] [[!HTTP-COND]] [[!HTTP-CACHING]] [[!HTTP-AUTH]] + <li><p> In resolving the HTTP request, there is an evitable situaion that the user agent must + resend the <var>request</var> body (e.g. socket time-out). + If <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> is non-null, and <var>request</var>'s + <a for=request>body</a>'s <a for=body>source</a> is null, there is an <a>implementation-defined</a> + cache limit not to cache the entire <a for=request>body</a>'s stream. If the cache runs out, + return a <a>network error</a>. This paragraph sounds like a mixture of normative text and non-normative notes. How about the following? The user agent may have a buffer of an implementation-defined size and store the part of request's body to the buffer, when request's body is non-null and its source is null. The user agent may use the buffer to re-send request's body to the network. (note) The re-sending is needed when the connection is timed out, for example. If request's body is sent more than the buffer size, it leads to a network error. (note) The buffer is not needed when request's body's source is non-null, because the body can be re-created from request's body's source. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1204#pullrequestreview-629766307
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2021 09:33:46 UTC