- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 13:05:49 UTC
Could an alternative be to tackle this through https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-type-mapping? That we assert that the JS value is not a Window object and when given a JS WindowProxy object, we return the IDL Window object for the JS WindowProxy's [[Window]] object? And that an IDL Window object is mapped back to a JS WindowProxy object (it seems this would have to go through the browsing context which isn't ideal). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/656#issuecomment-685722328
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 13:05:49 UTC