- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 04:48:19 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/860/review/414362539@github.com>
@annevk commented on this pull request.
> @@ -2195,6 +2195,10 @@ steps:</p>
<li><p>If the <i>open flag</i> is set and <var>shadow</var>'s <a for=ShadowRoot>mode</a> is
<em>not</em> "<code>open</code>", then return null.</p></li>
+ <li><p>If the <var>shadow</var>'s <a for=ShadowRoot>slot assignment</a> is set to "<code>manual</code>",
+ return the associated slot in <var>shadow</var>'s tree whose <a>manuallyAssignedNodes</a> includes
You want to change this to be more similar to the next step in terms of wording. Although I suppose you can leave out "first" and "tree order" since there's guaranteed to be a single slot if I understand it correctly.
> @@ -5731,6 +5737,9 @@ It is initially set to false.</p>
<!-- If we ever change this, e.g., add a ShadowRoot object constructor, that would have serious
consequences for innerHTML. -->
+<p><a for=/>Shadow roots</a> have an associated <dfn for=ShadowRoot>slot assignment</dfn>
+("<code>manual</code>" or "<code>auto</code>"), whose default value is "<code>auto</code>".</p>
I don't think we have to state a default/initial value as it's always given. This is also a problem with delegates focus.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/860#pullrequestreview-414362539
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2020 11:48:32 UTC