- From: Mason Freed <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:50:41 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 21:50:54 UTC
Thanks for the review! I think i I addressed all of your comments, but let me know what else needs attention. > FWIW, I think that apart from formatting (and it needs rebasing), this largely looks fine. Cloning shadow trees looks rather odd to me though. The explainer also doesn't go into this from a quick scan. This is a good point, which wasn't previously in the explainer. I came across this behavior as I was implementing. Based on this comment, I've added a section to the explainer that details why this change was necessary - you can see that [here](https://github.com/mfreed7/declarative-shadow-dom/blob/master/README.md#ordinary-templates-containing-declarative-shadow-dom). The TL/DR is that without this change (or something similar), you can't use declarative Shadow DOM inside an "ordinary" template. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/858#issuecomment-642944808
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 21:50:54 UTC