- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 04:08:27 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/858/review/427941016@github.com>
@annevk commented on this pull request. FWIW, I think that apart from formatting (and it needs rebasing), this largely looks fine. Cloning shadow trees looks rather odd to me though. The explainer also doesn't go into this from a quick scan. > @@ -6694,10 +6722,35 @@ when invoked, must run these steps: invoked, must run these steps: <ol> - <li><p>If <a>this</a>'s <a for=Element>namespace</a> is <em>not</em> the <a>HTML namespace</a>, + + <li><p>Run <a>attach a shadow root</a> with <var>shadow host</var> equal to <a>this</a>, + <var>mode</var> equal to <var>init</var>'s {{ShadowRootInit/mode}}, and <var>delegates focus</var> + equal to <var>init</var>'s {{ShadowRootInit/delegatesFocus}}.</p></li> + + <li><p>Return <a>this</a>'s <a for=Element>shadow root</a>.</p></li> + +</ol> + +<p>The <dfn attribute for=Element><code>shadowRoot</code></dfn> attribute's getter must run these +steps: + +<ol> + <li><p>Let <var>shadow</var> be <var>shadow host</var>'s <a for=Element>shadow root</a>. shadow host should be this, right? > "{{NotSupportedError!!exception}}" {{DOMException}}. - <li><p>Let <var>shadow</var> be a new <a for=/>shadow root</a> whose <a for=Node>node document</a> - is <a>this</a>'s <a for=Node>node document</a>, <a for=DocumentFragment>host</a> is <a>this</a>, - and <a for=ShadowRoot>mode</a> is <var>init</var>'s {{ShadowRootInit/mode}}. - - <li><p>Set <var>shadow</var>'s <a for=ShadowRoot>delegates focus</a> to <var>init</var>'s - {{ShadowRootInit/delegatesFocus}}. + <li><p>If <var>shadow host</var> has a non-null <a for=/>shadow root</a> whose + <a for=ShadowRoot>is declarative shadow root</a> property is true, then <a for=/>remove</a> all of + <a for=/>shadow root</a>'s <a>children</a>, in <a>tree order</a>. Return <var>shadow host</var>'s <a for=/>shadow root</a>. I think it would be clearer to have a single non-null step and then have these algorithm exists (throw and return) as substeps. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/858#pullrequestreview-427941016
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2020 11:08:39 UTC