Re: [heycam/webidl] Some things do not seem sound in “react to a Promise<T>” (#943)

> So if “upon rejection” were redefined as steps to be run if either the Promise state is rejected or if conversion in a corresponding “upon fulfillment” fails, it seems like that would be sufficient to make the behavior rational.

I don't think we want to have any connection between "upon rejection" and "upon fulfillment" in this manner. They're not meant to be used as a pair; if you want that, use "react".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/943#issuecomment-742575244