Re: [heycam/webidl] Some things do not seem sound in “react to a Promise<T>” (#943)

@domenic I think I understand the intention there, but if that’s the case, it’s easy to miss that “upon rejection” steps will never execute if conversion fails unless the subject promise is the one returned by “upon fulfillment” instead of the original promise. This is the case currently (in the spec, but not in implementations afaik) and would continue to be the case even if conversion is removed from the rejection path. Perhaps an advisory note would be sufficient though.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/943#issuecomment-747311172