- From: Joe Pea <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:28:14 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2020 02:28:26 UTC
@calebdwilliams Basically what you're proposing is an alternative that (supposedly) avoids perf costs of what I am describing, right? I asked at https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/745#issuecomment-668922849 and https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/889#issuecomment-668932473 about the actual performance metrics. It would be helpful if browser authors could point to some performance evidence. The use case that I showed the snippet of code for in https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/889#issuecomment-668932473 seems very valid, and I doubt it would cause any performance issue, for example. Of course, I also don't have performance metrics, but then again I'm not authoring the web engine. What I _can_ do is try to make a polyfill, and see how that performas. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/883#issuecomment-668939230
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2020 02:28:26 UTC