Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343)

Thanks, @burnburn. We appreciate your quick reply. 

We had this issue open because you requested a TAG review. Apologies if we missed a subsequent "Thanks but never mind" comment! 

We will close this now.

I'd also like to add, because I'm concerned we may have generated some confusion here: the TAG's remit isn't contained to work within W3C working groups. Our [charter](https://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-tag-charter.html) says "The TAG will coordinate its work with other groups within and outside of W3C whose technologies have an impact on Web architecture." In practice, that means that we offer advice on work from community groups, TC39, the IETF, WHATWG, and others -- as well as work from W3C working groups.

Our interest in your complete ecosystem is where we may be able to add value to your work, given that it sounds like that is where verifiable credentials may have architectural implications for the web. This is why we've been asking for information beyond the scope of your W3C working group's charter.

Also, one of our tenets for the web is that all of the documents and specs that form the web technologies are fully open and visible -- which is why we haven't taken up your kind offer for a call. We are keen to see this fully documented in the open, ideally in a standards venue in due course -- though initially, we'd be happy to see it in a GitHub repo or otherwise published on the web.

Hope that helps, and we do wish you luck with this important work.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/343#issuecomment-531625467