Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343)

Hi all. We are returning to this at our F2F in Tokyo. We'd like to resolve it ASAP, so it would be good to sort these questions:

1. @burnburn, have you managed to resolve @lknik's concerns?

2. What part of this ecosystem is outside of your charter and specified elsewhere? Could we please see those specs/documents, to understand how all the pieces fit together?  Specifically, We are concerned by this part of @travisleithead's comment:

> Our overarching concern, is that if this specification becomes a standard, it will be held up by governments and lawmakers as the new requirement for a DiD data model, but will be impossible to get interop in practice (because of the out-of-scope bits that @burnburn mentioned in the OP)

What important parts of this are currently out of scope?


We are still unclear how this spec fits into the ecosystem you imagine, and how that works with the web architecture. If you can help us understand this, we can close it in the next day or two. If not, we're not sure we can add much value here. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/343#issuecomment-530664549