- From: Gus Caplan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:14:41 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2019 17:14:43 UTC
@littledan perhaps when i find some time... the idea @syg and i came up with is basically instead of failing the entire graph, just make a top level await expression itself throw. Since an `await` resume abruptly already, this doesn't introduce weird new semantics or the appearance of new parse goals. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407#issuecomment-540684393
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2019 17:14:43 UTC