- From: Shu-yu Guo <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 21:10:59 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2019 04:11:01 UTC
Having SWs ban `[[Async]]: true` modules feels like a fine solution but I think still requires more formal ecma262 allowance. Whatever happened with Anne's [original suggestion](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-top-level-await/issues/79#issuecomment-499398393)? I'd be happy to propose adding a [[AllowAsyncModule]] bit to agents a la the [[CanBlock]] bit `Atomics.wait`. The spirit of both are the same: different agents have different constraints around the sync-ness of computation, whether it be indefinite blocking or async modules. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407#issuecomment-539818209
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2019 04:11:01 UTC