Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serial API (#431)

Thank you for the reminder. @kenchris pointed out at BlinkOn that the early draft status of the specification was causing confusion for the TAG reviewer. At this point I think feedback should focus on the text in the explainer and the security and privacy questionnaire.

The areas that I think are well-formed enough for meaningful feedback are the `open()`, `close()`, `getSignals()` and `setSignals()` methods as well as the `readable` and `writable` attributes and integration with the WHATWG Streams API. These are the parts that I think are well described in the explainer and for which I have some draft specification text in [my fork](https://reillyeon.github.io/serial).

On the other hand the device properties exposed by the `getInfo()` method, filter parameters for `requestDevice()` and the permission persistence model are all still under development.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/431#issuecomment-555768187