- From: Lukasz Olejnik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 13:04:48 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2019 21:04:50 UTC
Hi, Security/privacy self-check comments. > If an implementation chooses to make these permissions persist across browsing sessions then the availability of a particular device consitutes a piece of state Any observations about implementations choosing to go for persistent permissions? Why leaving it to implementations? > A privacy-sensitive user is expected to not grant I would be cautious with wording suggesting a particular expectations from users... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/431#issuecomment-550019216
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2019 21:04:50 UTC