- From: hiroshige-g <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:51:53 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 November 2019 23:51:58 UTC
> Although, this does seem subject to change depending on the outcome of #839 and I think any conclusion we might reach here would at least have to be revisited based on how that turns out. For example say that we end up with a syntax that allows someone to write this sort of thing: > `import something from "./example" with type: typeThatDoesntExist` > Perhaps the mechanism that would fail the above should also be used to fail > `import sheet from "./example" with type: css` when used in a Worker. Er, yes, #839 will affect how we reject non-CSS MIME types for `import sheet from "./example" with type: css`, which will affect the design/decision here. > In any case I don't think it needs to block [this implementation](https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1799923) as long as we're behind a flag and not really locked in to any decision. Yeah, agree. Let's land the implementation, resolve #839 and then resume the discussion here after that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/854#issuecomment-555264929
Received on Monday, 18 November 2019 23:51:58 UTC