- From: Dan Clark <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:47:18 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 November 2019 23:47:23 UTC
It's a good point that importing a CSS module in a Worker can be compared to trying to instantiate a constructable stylesheet, and I'm leaning towards the parse error approach based on this reasoning. Although, this does seem subject to change depending on the outcome of #839 and I think any conclusion we might reach here would at least have to be revisited based on how that turns out. For example say that we end up with a syntax that allows someone to write this sort of thing: ```import something from "./example" with type: typeThatDoesntExist``` Perhaps the mechanism that would fail the above should also be used to fail ```import sheet from "./example" with type: css``` when used in a Worker. In any case I don't think it needs to block [this implementation](https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1799923) as long as we're behind a flag and not really locked in to any decision. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/854#issuecomment-555263853
Received on Monday, 18 November 2019 23:47:23 UTC