Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69)

Thanks for the review!

> 1. Are other implementers on board with exposing this?
There has been no public support, but also no opposition.

> 2. Are there bugs filed against those implementations?
Firefox: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1565716
Safari: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199762

> 3. Is there a PR to make the tests stop being tentative that we can land together with this assuming all is in order? (There's a couple minor things I wonder about with the tests we can maybe tackle there, e.g., I don't see a need to do || 0 for the new fields as they should always be defined in a compliant implementation.)
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1700564

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/69#issuecomment-511056102