- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:41:53 -0700
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 15 July 2019 12:42:15 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. > @@ -178,7 +178,21 @@ larger <a>site storage quota</a>. Factors such as navigation frequency, recency bookmarking, and <a href="#persistence">permission</a> for {{"persistent-storage"}} can be used as indications of "popularity". +The <dfn export>application cache site storage usage</dfn> for an <a for=/>origin</a> +<var>origin</var> is a rough estimate of the amount of bytes used in <a>Application Cache</a> +in <var>origin</var>'s <a>site storage unit</a>. [[!HTML]] The other PR did not have the necessary wording either, right? But yeah, I think they should be included here and should probably be noted closer to where we define these features. Not in a separate section somewhere. The separate section seems like a fine place to highlight some of the trickier areas, but in general we should note security requirements right alongside general implementation requirements. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/69#discussion_r303414471
Received on Monday, 15 July 2019 12:42:15 UTC