- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
 - Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:41:53 -0700
 - To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
 - Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
 
Received on Monday, 15 July 2019 12:42:15 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request.
> @@ -178,7 +178,21 @@ larger <a>site storage quota</a>. Factors such as navigation frequency, recency
 bookmarking, and <a href="#persistence">permission</a> for {{"persistent-storage"}} can be used as
 indications of "popularity".
 
+The <dfn export>application cache site storage usage</dfn> for an <a for=/>origin</a>
+<var>origin</var> is a rough estimate of the amount of bytes used in <a>Application Cache</a>
+in <var>origin</var>'s <a>site storage unit</a>. [[!HTML]]
The other PR did not have the necessary wording either, right? But yeah, I think they should be included here and should probably be noted closer to where we define these features. Not in a separate section somewhere. The separate section seems like a fine place to highlight some of the trickier areas, but in general we should note security requirements right alongside general implementation requirements.
-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/69#discussion_r303414471
Received on Monday, 15 July 2019 12:42:15 UTC