- From: TAMURA, Kent <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 03:27:41 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/762/561126232@github.com>
@othermaciej > One point I am confused about: `control` was described in [#762 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-557488222) as a Safari-specific distinction, but per [#762 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-484461545) , it seems like Chrome would care about this distinction too, at least on macOS. [My older comment](https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-484461545) was incorrect. Chrome doesn't respect "Full Keyboard Access" setting. [crbug.com/119125](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=119125) @alice > Regarding "editable", does that boil down to text-editable? If that is the case, could we combine this with the hinting we use for `:focus-visible`, which in practice is equivalent to "does this show a virtual keyboard if a physical keyboard is not present"? Could we have a primitive for _that_ concept (which is very close to `inputmode`), instead of making it a separate focus type? AFAIK, In Chrome the `control` category discussed here matches to elements which don't match to `:focus-visible`. So the specification may mention that the category might affect `:focus-visible` selector. I'm not sure about relationship with the virtual keyboard stuff. Chrome and Safari don't show a virtual keyboard for focused `<select>`, but `<select>` is click-focusable, right? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-561126232
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2019 11:27:44 UTC