Re: [heycam/webidl] Should "constructor" be allowed as an argument name? (#779)

If this is as easy as for `async` I think allowing this would be great. There's an emerging pattern of APIs taking constructors and not being able to use the obvious name would be rather unfortunate and a likely continuing source of confusion.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/779#issuecomment-525700835