- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:24:27 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2019 13:24:49 UTC
Yes, we should do it. In particular, I think we should add "constructor" to ArgumentNameKeyword, and maybe allow it in dictionary member names (will need a new production). Not sure about AttributeNameKeyword; it's a little weird to add an attribute named "constructor", given that JS already has semantics for that. I don't know why https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/325c1a707819602feff736f129cb36055ba6d94f/dom/webidl/CustomElementRegistry.webidl#8 was named "functionConstructor" instead of "constructor". :( It's that way in the first patches in <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1275833> which already don't match the spec IDL... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/779#issuecomment-525743606
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2019 13:24:49 UTC