[w3ctag/design-reviews] Meta: ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md should better handle cases of active disagreement (#368)

@dbaron wrote, in [a comment](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/356#issuecomment-486461058) on #356:

> I think one of the conclusions is that our template for requesting TAG reviews is better suited for specifications that already have consensus within the group working on them, than for areas with active disputes.

This is an issue for tracking the work of improving the issue template to also handle cases of active dispute / where consensus has not been reached.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/368