- From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:40:21 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/pull/718/review/231278930@github.com>
littledan commented on this pull request. > @@ -12284,9 +12310,15 @@ The value of the [=function object=]’s <code class="idl">name</code> property </div> <div algorithm> - An ECMAScript value |value| <dfn export>implements</dfn> an [=interface=] |interface| - if |value| [=is a platform object=] and the [=inclusive inherited interfaces=] of - |value|.\[[PrimaryInterface]] [=list/contains=] |interface|. + An ECMAScript value |value| <dfn export>implements</dfn> an [=interface=] |interface| if the + following steps return true: + + 1. If |value| [=is a platform object|is not a platform object=], return false. + 1. If the [=inclusive inherited interfaces=] of |value|.\[[PrimaryInterface]] does not + [=list/contain=] |interface|, return false. + 1. If |interface| has a [{{SameRealmBrandCheck}}] [=extended attribute=] and + |value|.\[[Realm]] is not the [=current Realm=], return false. Is the current Realm well-defined everywhere that the "implements" algorithm is used? I'm wondering if we should leave "implements" alone and define a separate algorithm that's invoked from operations, which does what you have written here. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/718#pullrequestreview-231278930
Received on Friday, 26 April 2019 17:40:44 UTC