Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Autoplay Detection API (#356)

> It also wasn't clear to what extent the review request was (a) a request to review one of the two alternatives (b) a request to review both alternatives, or (c) a request to weigh in on the dispute between the alternatives. If it's (c), then we'd be hesitant to weigh in without a chance to read the arguments presented by each side in that dispute... and it's not entirely clear where those are.
> 

My understanding is (c). We discussed this at length during the F2F last month but could not agree on the autoplay policy API, so the escalation was to have the TAG evaluate the alternatives and provide guidance.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/356#issuecomment-486739447