- From: Tomek Wytrębowicz <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:26:12 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2019 05:26:34 UTC
"disappearing" makes it also problematic to implement a inter-operable custom element polyfill as stated https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4566 I think the main concern and reason was the memory usage https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/510#issuecomment-329349780. Maybe to address also https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/510#issuecomment-372224104 > The proposed semantics of shadow element has this problematic behavior (since shadow isn't a real element). we could keep `<shadowroot>` element there as we keep `<template>`. Just make it so it does not have `.children`. Maybe we could keep `hostElement.shadowRoot === hostElement.querySelector('shadowroot').content` for open shadows, and both `null` for closed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/510#issuecomment-486524288
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2019 05:26:34 UTC