- From: Dave Tapuska <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:20:02 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2019 13:20:24 UTC
dtapuska commented on this pull request. > + "<code>no-cache</code>". + + <li><p>Set <var>revalidateRequest</var>'s + <a for=request>prevent no-cache cache-control header modification flag</a>. + + <li><p>Set <var>revalidateRequest</var>'s <a for=request>service-workers mode</a> set to + "<code>none</code>". + + <li> + <p><a>In parallel</a>, perform <a for=main>main fetch</a> using + <var>revalidateRequest</var>. + + <p class=note>This fetch is only meant to update the state of the HTTP cache and the + response will be unused until another cache access. The stale response will be used as the + response to current request. This fetch is issued in the context of a client so if it goes + away the request will be terminated. And these are precisely things that Chrome's SWR won't work on because they are not fetched in the context of an agent. It will work for agents (workers, windows, service workers). @annevk would you feel more comfortable omitting this text entirely? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/853#discussion_r276659128
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2019 13:20:24 UTC