- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:09:27 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 21:09:49 UTC
@tkent-google I think that is the simplest design that could work. (Although I would change the name to be something less spec-focused and more intelligible to authors, but that doesn't matter for now.) However, the above discussion revealed a few other possibilities: - A tri-state attribute, to capture sequential-focus-navigable vs. not. See https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-414882495 . - The TPAC discussion about platform convention matching. That would lead to an API that says something like `focusBehavesLike: "a"` or `focusBehavesLike: "button"`. Maybe we could come up with something more restrictive, like a set of a few archetypes (instead of allowing any tag name). What do you think of these considerations? Maybe they are overcomplicating things, and we should just go with the simple boolean version. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-484262443
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 21:09:49 UTC