- From: Ingvar Stepanyan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:41:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 8 April 2019 11:41:42 UTC
> However, we managed to narrow our use case down to only checking <input>, and after the input bug is fixed we won't need to check anything, so we no longer care much about the performance. Why? There's still plenty of places strings with lone surrogates can come from (as mentioned above). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/174#issuecomment-480796800
Received on Monday, 8 April 2019 11:41:42 UTC