- From: sleevi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:51:49 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 5 April 2019 07:52:11 UTC
Note the DISCUSSION section within Section 2.1 of RFC-1123. The relaxation of the LDH rule was still intended to be unambiguously parsable as different from an IP address (particularly in dotted quad form), by virtue of the fact that all TLDs at the time contained at least one letter, and subsequent policy by IANA with respect to the functions provided by ICANN has further codified that all-numeric TLDs will not be introduced. That other applications accept such is largely due to a lack of discrimination in processing the authority portion, based on the type of address supplied - thus causing functions like inet_aton (which, in the BSD sockets implementation, first introduced handling for such syntactically invalid IP addresses) to handle this silently and gracefully, despite being syntactically ambiguous and thus arguably invalid. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/436#issuecomment-480182247
Received on Friday, 5 April 2019 07:52:11 UTC