Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343)

Hi all, and thanks for bringing this to us. We have a couple of questions here, though we'd like to look into the data model further for next week and get back to you on that:

1. This is exciting work, and we can see the kind of ecosystem you're trying to build – but we are struggling to understand its relationship to the web. Your charter suggests you'll be creating some vocabularies – presumably those will operate in line with the existing web technologies? What are you expecting those to be?

2. Similarly, the Verifiable Claims [use cases](https://w3c.github.io/vc-use-cases/) doc (good, clear document, by the way!) implies a number of implementors to make the use cases work. Can you give us a sense of what products/services you would expect those to be, to illustrate this? It looks like you're not looking at browser vendors -- which is fine, to be clear! -- but it might help us to understand what existing web technologies/architecture you're planning to work with.

3. It would be helpful for us to see the resolution of [those issues](https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/created_by/nadalin) that @nadalin (and/with? @travisleithead) have filed.

Thanks again! 



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/343#issuecomment-479354381