Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider adding TextEncoder.containsLoneSurrogates() static (#174)

> I don't think it has been demonstrated that asking for losslessness is going to be a common use case. 

I'm somewhat worried that the reason is that exactly that alternative is not exposed in the API and developers are not aware that it's currently lossy by default. (I personally wasn't aware of this until running into this issue.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/174#issuecomment-479059324

Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2019 15:44:10 UTC