Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] provide a way to execute work after browser has consumed a response (#1397)

I also would prefer a method like `evt.afterResponse`, rather than a new `evt` property that is only designed to be passed in to waitUntil.

Using the word "responded" might be confusing if it's also meant to be a fallback for a response.

@wanderview what exactly do you mean here? Is this meant to catch a user code bug where within the fetch event handler, they literally never invoke `evt.respondWith`?
> This could also support fallback cases where respondWith() is not called at all.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1397#issuecomment-479030044