Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider adding TextEncoder.containsLoneSurrogates() static (#174)

I see. I think I'd be still in favour of handling them in `TextEncoder` too, given how often it's going to be used with JS strings, even if it means adding support for streaming as well.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/174#issuecomment-478979224

Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2019 12:47:43 UTC