Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) from Boris Zbarsky on 2018-09-28 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2018)

From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:45:35 +0000 (UTC)
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/107/425560773@github.com>

Right, for any specific API you can probably find a way.  But it requires some creative thought every time, and is too easy to mess up.

Note that I am not a huge fan of the out-of-band list either.  The only good news is that I _think_ all browsers could code-generate that list from the same IDL that they use to code-generate their dictionary implementations.  So apart from bugs in the code generators, some of the issues with  the list not matching reality that we had in the past would probably be avoidable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-425560773

Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 20:45:58 UTC