- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 14:02:39 UTC
Why would 2 not be possible? The IDL layer can always throw, right? So throw something IDL would never throw, like `1`. It seems hard for that to have a side-effect since at that point the specification algorithm hasn't run. And although 1 is non-obvious, it seems better than maintaining a "supported features" side-table, which we've known historically to not work. (Perhaps we can do better now with better tests, but hmm...) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-425445428
Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 14:02:39 UTC