Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107)

Why would 2 not be possible? The IDL layer can always throw, right? So throw something IDL would never throw, like `1`. It seems hard for that to have a side-effect since at that point the specification algorithm hasn't run.

And although 1 is non-obvious, it seems better than maintaining a "supported features" side-table, which we've known historically to not work. (Perhaps we can do better now with better tests, but hmm...)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-425445428

Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 14:02:39 UTC