- From: EnnexMB <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:43:47 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2018 16:44:09 UTC
My personal goal is to fully understand the URL syntax, so I can code it properly in my websites. That's why I came to check the URL Standard in the first place. But when I found that no simple representation of the syntax was given there, rather than just complain about it, I offered to pitch in and help make one. So that's the goal of my participation in this issue, to help develop a human-friendly representation of the URL syntax for inclusion in the Standard. My [first attempt at that](https://github.com/whatwg/meta/issues/104) showed the scheme as required because I made the mistake of basing it on section 4.5. Since section 4.3 describes what URLs developers should write and 4.4 describes URLs browsers should accept, I presume the logic of both of those should be the same. So if I were to go through each of those sections and lay out the syntax they represent, I should get the same result from each section. Is that correct? (I ask that question because the same was not true for section 4.5.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/337#issuecomment-422464815
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2018 16:44:09 UTC